If you've been hanging with me for the last several posts, I've been hashing through the history of Christmas. One thing is certain. Christmas is a collision of both secular and Christian traditions. And it has been this way since it's inception.
Christians ought not to feel infringed upon by the lack of emphasis that others give to the birth of Jesus in light of other competing traditions. In fact, in a nation that continually marches towards further secularism and pluralism, we should not be surprised even now as well as in the future as to how much more of a minority our faith is quickly becoming. (We've already seen it's effect take place in the elections as Barna reports that almost 90% of evangelicals voted Republican and still it was not a large enough population to swing the votes in favor of McCain.)
And we must recall that early Christian fathers (440 A.D.) chose to celebrate the birth of Christ on December 25th as they hoped it would eventually override the popular celebrations devoted to pagan gods. That same competition exists even today only in the form of a red suit mythology as opposed to one of Greek origin.
To argue further, we must recall that early Christians never thought to celebrate the birth of Jesus. The disciples did not recognize their friend and Savior's birth as cause for celebration. Only 2 of the 4 Gospels even address the birth of Jesus of Nazareth. Why is this? Because the point of Jesus was not necessarily his birth, but his life, his death, his resurrection. To this end, all 4 Gospels devote a majority of their content (especially his death and resurrection).
What, then, is the point of Christmas for the Christ Follower? The point of Christmas is in many ways to point us to the upcoming celebration of Easter. Christmas is more so the "planting of a seed" than it is the celebration of what Jesus would come to accomplish. Yet, we have chosen to celebrate his birth along with everything else he would soon come to achieve. While there is nothing wrong with such a focus (the angels did the same), we should realize that for Christians it is Easter, as opposed to Christmas, that should be our grandest of celebrations (An observation made by N.T. Wright in his book, "Surprised by Hope", pg. 23).
What is even more remarkable is how obscure and insignificant the story of Jesus' birth appears. His birth was shared by husband, wife, and some lowly shepherds. A man named Simeon recognized the significance of this child as did Mary's cousin, Elizabeth. Then a few years later some Wise Men journeyed from afar to worship the coming of a King. But that is it.
Why so few? Why in such a lowly, humble manger? All this for the coming of a King? The Savior of all mankind?
The birth of Jesus of Nazareth was the planting of a seed. It would be 30 years before this man would come to all humanity in the manner he was promised. For now he would largely go unnoticed.
On Christmas, millions of believers world wide will recognize this day as cause for rejoicing. But 2,000 year ago, it was a much smaller occasion. It was Jesus, his mother Mary, his father Joseph, and some strangers who were employed as shepherds.
It was the night a seed was planted. Rejoicing from the multitudes would only come after Jesus lived his life, tasted death, and resurrected. This Christmas allow your celebrations to move in this direction. Let Christmas be the planting of a seed. And begin to build towards April when we celebrate what really would change everything.
Perhaps we need an advent calendar that BEGINS December 25th and ENDS on Easter Morning. Then our Easter baskets would have to be stuffed larger than our stockings and higher than our Christmas trees. I'm not sure we could afford two Christmases.
Let the celebrating begin! For a seed was planted that would grow to save us all!














Recent Comments